Does the new mark work as favicon, app icon, tab, social avatar, map pin, and ad thumbnail?
Small read
Side-by-side screenshots at the smallest real sizes.
Branding guide · evidence and decision
A logo redesign checklist for recognition risk, hidden rollout cost, favicon scale, signage distance, search memory, and customer cue testing.
decision · proof · use

A logo redesign cost checklist should cover recognition loss, rollout scope, hidden asset replacement, favicon and app icon scale, signage distance, shelf or thumbnail reading, search memory, and customer habit.
Use the scale below to rate each of the six checks, then add the ratings for a total from 0 to 18. These are GYB editorial review prompts and proposed decision bands, not a validated risk model or evidence that a launch will succeed. Record the evidence behind every rating and resolve missing critical evidence before approval.
The file cost is not the brand cost. Score the public surfaces the mark has to survive.
Small read
Side-by-side screenshots at the smallest real sizes.
Distance read
Photographic mockups from the actual reading distance.
Memory
Color, shape, wordmark, character, package, rhythm, phrase, or domain.
Rollout
Website, templates, product UI, documents, invoices, uniforms, packaging, support, partners, and campaigns.
Bridge
Transition lockup, retained color, old-name search, redirect, support script, and launch sequence.
Proof
New category, new product reality, old confusion, legal conflict, or recognition problem.
These traps make a cheap design file expensive.
The new identity works in a large presentation and disappears in tabs, app icons, or thumbnails.
Test the smallest reads first.
A working color, shape, or wordmark is removed without a bridge.
Keep a cue during transition.
The team approves design before counting every public place the mark appears.
Build the rollout ledger.
The real problem is proof, category, offer, or route, but the logo is easier to change.
Run the diagnostic first.
A high score records the reviewer’s assessment of completeness. It does not establish that risk is controlled; inspect the evidence and unresolved risks before choosing a rollout.
Logo cost is the redesign plus every public surface it touches.
The same redesign move can protect memory or destroy it.
A logo file can be cheap. A logo change is not cheap when it breaks recognition, requires many surfaces to be replaced, or forces the buyer to relearn the brand at the point of choice.
The checklist should ask what the old mark still does. If it helps people identify, trust, find, or remember the brand, the redesign needs a bridge or a better reason.
Put the old and new mark into the real places where the buyer sees it: favicon, email, invoice, product card, package, ad, shelf, mobile header, map listing, signage, and AI image result.
Then write the rollout scope. If the scope is unknown, the cost is unknown.
The page should tell the reader which file to build next.
If the logo change affects a real rollout, run the rebrand risk gate or send the decision file.
It should include recognition testing, rollout scope, hidden surfaces, small-size readability, signage distance, search memory, customer habit, bridge cues, and stop rules.
The hidden cost is in asset replacement, customer confusion, lost recognition, partner updates, search memory, support language, and rollout errors.
No. Useful cues should be preserved or bridged when they still help people recognize and trust the brand.